Go to content

Galatians Study - Messianic Literary Corner

Messianic Literary Corner
Skip menu
Messianic Literary Corner
Skip menu
Epistle to the Galatians
Defending the Gospel of Grace

An Introduction
The   second piece of writing which emerged from the general controversy  over  keeping the Torah (Mosaic Law) was Paul's epistle to the  Galatians, As  James was written from the standpoint of a strict Torah  observant Jew  who worked to avoid all semblance of looseness and  license in the use of  ethical freedom, "the perfect law of liberty"  (Jas. 1:25), so Galatians  was written by a champion of freedom who saw  that neither Gentiles nor  Jews could be delivered from their sins by  self-effort in keeping a set  of ethical principles. Galatians  accordingly has been called "The Magna  Charta of spiritual  emancipation", because it declared that "Messiah  Yeshua (Christ Jesus)  redeemed us from the curse of the law, having  become a curse for us ...  that we might receive the promise of the  Spirit through faith" (Gal.  3:13,14).

Destination

Galatia   is the name that was given originally to the territory in north  central  Asia. Minor, where the invading Gauls settled in the third  century  before Christ and maintained an independent kingdom for many  years.  Gradually the Gallic population was absorbed into the other  peoples  living there, and after a number of political changes, the  territory  became the property of Rome in 25 B.C.
The   Romans incorporated this northern section into a larger division of   land which they made a province and called by the name of Galatia.   Galatia, then, under Roman rule, could mean Galatia proper, which the   Gauls had founded, or it could be applied to the whole province which   included the southern cities of Antioch, Iconium, Derbe, and Lystra.   Biblical scholars assume that Paul's visit to Galatia proper began on   the second journey when he left the southern territory of Derbe,  Lystra,  and Iconium, and traveled through "the region of Phrygia and  Galatia."  mentioned in Acts 16:6. According to this view, Paul  traversed the  territory of old Galatia, including the cities of  Pessinus, Ancyra, and  Tavium, and finally reached Troas after a long  journey. A second similar  trip on the third journey is stated in Acts  18:23.

Their  theory supposes that "the churches of Galatia"  were those of Antioch of  Pisidia, Iconium, Derbe, and Lystra which Paul  established on his first  missionary journey. They were subsequently  revisited on the later  journeys (Acts 16:1-6, 18:23). The second tour  of these southern  churches did not preclude completely a northern swing  in his last  itinerary, for the language of Acts 16:2, 4, and 6 shows  that Paul  covered the territory around Derbe and Lystra, and then that  he went  along the Phrygio-Galatic border to Mysia and Bithynia, at  which point  he turned westward to Troas.

Date

If   then, this theory be adopted, it means that Paul and Barnabas on their   first tour preached in the cities of southern Galatia, and on their   return trip organized the converts into church groups (Acts 14:21-23),   closing their mission about A.D. 48. After their return to Antioch,   Peter paid a visit to the city, and openly fellowshipped with the   Gentile converts. He had not been there long before some men came down   from Jerusalem who professed to follow the strict observance of the law   that James practiced, and who argued that unless the converts were   circumcised, they could not be saved (15:1). Peter, overawed by their   attitude, withdrew from eating with the Gentiles. In the meantime the   same controversy had broken out in Galatia, agitated perhaps by local   Messianic Jewish influences which were quite strong (14:2). Paul   therefore on the eve of the council wrote this letter to the Galatians   churches, in order to settle for them by correspondence the question   which he expected to debate in the coming assembly in Jerusalem. This   conclusion is confirmed somewhat by a comparison of Peter's speech in   Acts 15:7-11 with the structure of Galatians as a whole. His emphasis  on  his personal calling and experience, on theological argumentation,  and  on the practical development of grace parallels the general outline  of  Galatians and also reflects Paul's conversation with him as  reported in  Galatians 2. If Galatians can be fitted into this  situation, it was  written from Antioch, just prior to the council in  A.D. 48 or 49.
Content

Galatians   was not written as an essay in contemporary history. It was a protest   against corruption of the gospel of Messiah Yeshua (Jesus Christ). The   essential truth of justification by faith rather than by the works of   the law had been obscured by the Torah observant Messianic Jewish   insistence that believers in Messiah must keep the law if they expected   to be perfect before God. When Paul learned that this teaching had  begun  to penetrate the Galatian churches and that it had alienated them  from  their heritage of Liberty, he wrote the impassioned remonstrance  that is  contained in this epistle. The tone of the book is warlike. It  fairly  crackles with indignation though it is not the anger of personal  pique  but of spiritual principle. "Though we, or an angel from heaven,  should  preach unto you any gospel other than that which we preached  unto you,  let him be anathema" (1:8), cried Paul as he reproved the  Galatians for  their acceptance of the legalistic error.

Outline

The structure of Galatians is symmetrical and logical. Its outline is as follows:

GALATIANS: THE DEFENSE OF SPIRITUAL LIBERTY

Introduction:  1:1-9
·         Salutation: The Ground of Liberty  1:1-5
·         Occasion: The Challenge to Liberty  1:6-9

I. The Biographical Argument: An Independent Revelation  1:10-2:21
·         Independent of Human Teaching  1:10-17
·         Independent of Judean Congregations  1:18-24
·         Independent of Judaizing Brethren  2:1-10
·         Independent of Apostolic Pressure  2:11-18
·         Independent of Selfish Interest  2:19-21

II. The Theological Argument: The Failure of Legalism  3:1-4:31
·         From Personal Experience  3:1-5
·         From Old Testament Teaching  3:6-14
·         From Priority of Promise  3:15-22
·         From Superiority of Mature Faith  3:23-4:7
·         From Danger of Reaction  4:8-11
·         From Contrast of Motives  4:12-20
·         From Contrast of Bondage and Liberty  4:21-31

III. The Practical Argument: The Effect of Liberty  5:1-6:10
·         Introductory Statement  5:1
·         The Consequences of Legalism  5:2-12
·         The Definition of Freedom  5:13-15
·         Individual Practice  5:16-24
·         Social Practice  5:25-6:10

IV. Conclusion  6:11-18
·         The Motive of Liberty: The Cross  6:11-16
·         The Price of Liberty: Suffering  6:17
·         The Benediction of Liberty  6:18

Evaluation

The   book is the earliest of Paul's extant writings. It summarizes the  heart  of "the gospel which [he preached] among both Jews and Gentiles"  (Gal.  2:2). In it he showed that man's chief problem is obtaining a  right  standing with God. Since humanity is incapable of establishing  this  himself because "a man is not justified by the works of the law"  (2:16),  it must be provided for him by another. Messiah Yeshua has  given this  standing, for He "gave himself for your sins, that He might  deliver us  out of this present evil world" (1:4). His provision is  available to  those who put their full trust in Him, for "the promise by  faith in  Messiah [is] given to them that believe" (3:22). This  standing is not  simply a legal fiction, applied only externally or  ceremonially, but it  becomes part of the inner life through union with  Yeshua. "I have been  crucified with Messiah; and it is no longer I that  live, but Messiah  liveth in me: and that life which I now live in the  flesh I live in  faith, the faith which is in the Son of God, who loved  me, and gave  himself up for me" (2:20). Salvation is thus not only the  application of  a new life, but is also its impartation.

The   books of James and Galatians thus illustrates the two aspects of  Jewish  and Gentile believers which from the very beginning have seemed  to be  conflicting, though in reality they are supplementary. In James  there is  a stern insistence upon the ethic of Messiah, a demand that  faith prove  its existence by its fruits. Nevertheless James, no less  than Paul,  emphasizes the need of the transformation of the individual  by the grace  of God, for he says, "Of his own will he brought us forth  by the word  of truth, that we should be a kind of first fruits of his  creatures"  (Jas. 1:18). Galatians stresses the dynamic of the gospel  which produces  the ethic. "Messiah redeemed us from the curse of the  law, having  become a curse for us ... that upon the Gentiles might come  the blessing  of Abraham in Christ Jesus; that we might receive the  promise of the  Spirit through faith" (Gal. 3:13, 14). Nor was Paul less  concerned than  James about the ethical life, for he says: "Use not  your freedom for an  occasion to the flesh, but through love be servants  one to another"  (5:13). Like the two sides of a coin, these two  aspects of spiritual  truth must always accompany each other.

Today’s   Messianic Jews struggle in a similar way, whether to hold to mandatory   Torah observance or not. Paul’s writing clearly demonstrates that  Jewish  and Gentile believers in Messiah Yeshua are not bound to the  Law, but  rather grace. With this freedom, Messianic Jews may celebrate  Torah  observance conscious of their New Covenant freedoms and with  respect for  other Jewish and Gentile believers that are not so  observant.

(This study has been adapted from "New Testament Survey", by Merrill C. Tenney, Wheaton


Messianic Literary Corner

Created with WebSite X5
Back to content